<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blessing: Not Just What We Get</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get</link>
	<description>the home of Nathan Colquhoun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pistol Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Pistol Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Profound thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blessed to be a blessing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Profound thoughts.</p>
<p>Blessed to be a blessing.</p>
<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DVV</title>
		<link>http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>DVV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>Nathan,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole concept of being blessed in the first place is determined by whether or not I ill be obedient to God. Blessings are contingent on &quot;IF you will ... then I will.....&quot;. However, the opposite is also true, &quot;I you won&#039;t .... then you will be under a curse&quot; It&#039;s dependent upon our choosing to do what God&#039;s Word tells us to do. I whole heartedly agree with you in that the real blessing is not what we get, but in what we give. Robert Morris in his book &quot;The Blessed Life&quot; says that we give to give, we bless others in order to further the Kingdom of God. &lt;br /&gt;
Hey, there are a couple of great books that you may want to check out. &quot;Revolution&quot; by George Barna and Un christian by David Kinnaman &amp; Gabe Lyons. Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>The whole concept of being blessed in the first place is determined by whether or not I ill be obedient to God. Blessings are contingent on &#8220;IF you will &#8230; then I will&#8230;..&#8221;. However, the opposite is also true, &#8220;I you won&#8217;t &#8230;. then you will be under a curse&#8221; It&#8217;s dependent upon our choosing to do what God&#8217;s Word tells us to do. I whole heartedly agree with you in that the real blessing is not what we get, but in what we give. Robert Morris in his book &#8220;The Blessed Life&#8221; says that we give to give, we bless others in order to further the Kingdom of God. <br />
Hey, there are a couple of great books that you may want to check out. &#8220;Revolution&#8221; by George Barna and Un christian by David Kinnaman &amp; Gabe Lyons. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Hey Uncle Doug. Thanks for the comments as of late.  Part of me writing this post was because I am struggling with exactly what you brought up there.  You said &lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The whole concept of being blessed in the first place is determined by whether or not I ill be obedient to God. Blessings are contingent on &quot;IF you will ... then I will.....&quot;.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of trying to explain it myself, I&#039;ll quote Laurence Turner who&#039;s written a book on Genesis that I absolutely fell in love with.  He seems to be saying similar things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turner, page 64, Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;There are two problems in translating this paragraph. The first concerend the last clause of 12.2, &#039;so that you will be a blessing.&#039; The Hebrew actually contains and imperative, and a growing number of scholars favour retaining that sense here: &quot;be a blessing!&quot; So Abram is not simple being informed that he will become a blessing, but is commanded to be a blessing. If the force of the imperative is retained then the following Hebrew clauses should be rendered as consequences of that imperative: &#039;Be a blessing, so that I may bless those...&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, the promises of 12.3 depend upon Abram being a blessing. Just as clearly, the promises of 12.2a (great nation, belssing and great name), depend upon Abram obeying God&#039;s command in 12.1, &#039;Go!&#039;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It really changes everything doesn&#039;t it?  It&#039;s not so much of being a blessing with what God has blessed us with, but instead being a blessing which we then are blessed more and the cycle continues.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Uncle Doug. Thanks for the comments as of late.  Part of me writing this post was because I am struggling with exactly what you brought up there.  You said <br />
&#8220;The whole concept of being blessed in the first place is determined by whether or not I ill be obedient to God. Blessings are contingent on &#8220;IF you will &#8230; then I will&#8230;..&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Instead of trying to explain it myself, I&#8217;ll quote Laurence Turner who&#8217;s written a book on Genesis that I absolutely fell in love with.  He seems to be saying similar things.</p>
<p>Turner, page 64, Genesis</p>
<p>&#8220;There are two problems in translating this paragraph. The first concerend the last clause of 12.2, &#8216;so that you will be a blessing.&#8217; The Hebrew actually contains and imperative, and a growing number of scholars favour retaining that sense here: &#8220;be a blessing!&#8221; So Abram is not simple being informed that he will become a blessing, but is commanded to be a blessing. If the force of the imperative is retained then the following Hebrew clauses should be rendered as consequences of that imperative: &#8216;Be a blessing, so that I may bless those&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, the promises of 12.3 depend upon Abram being a blessing. Just as clearly, the promises of 12.2a (great nation, belssing and great name), depend upon Abram obeying God&#8217;s command in 12.1, &#8216;Go!&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>It really changes everything doesn&#8217;t it?  It&#8217;s not so much of being a blessing with what God has blessed us with, but instead being a blessing which we then are blessed more and the cycle continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DVV</title>
		<link>http://www.nathancolquhoun.com/2008/02/27/blessing-not-just-what-we-get#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>DVV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>Nathan,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think you got it. Say hello to Rachel for me. So, when are we goin go see you on the East Coast.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uncle Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>I think you got it. Say hello to Rachel for me. So, when are we goin go see you on the East Coast.</p>
<p>Uncle Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
